Probably https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_v._Thompson
> The ruling in the case invalidated state durational residency requirements for public assistance.
Yes, thank you!
Wow, surprising Saenz v Roe occurred when Shapiro v Thompson had already been decided.
But, yeah, all these cases make any state with improved welfare benefits a migration target for unproductive people. Classic game theory situation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._California
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saenz_v._Roe