Well it's not saying "nothing should be enforced ever because all enforcement is backed by violence", it is just acknowledging the reality of it and then determining if a particular rule justifies that, and then farther down, if a rule enforced by violence is unjust, determining whether the enforcing party is an enemy or not.

Generally libertarians only allow for rules against behaviors that violate the rights of others because of this, and I think that's about right.

> You're saying you want to use violence up to and including murder to keep our sidewalks clean!

Because that's what you _are_ saying. Laws are enforced by the police, and they are able to be enforced by the police because the police are legally able to use force. I do not understand what other view there is to take on the issue. In my mind, it's not an opinion, it's a fact.

Absolute nonsense. It’s merely walking through the chain of events and realizing that all dictates are backed by force.

The fact that people “don’t agree” means they’re morons. It is fact.