News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in brea... by Retric on Thursday September 02, 2021 @02:23PM (#28395526)
In the test they scored better than one radiologist, but worse than two working together. However: https://xkcd.com/882/
Re:Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in brea... by bpodgursky on Thursday September 02, 2021 @02:31PM (#28395611)
I've never personally had a radiology scan where two radiologists worked together on it.
Re:Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in brea... by pvarangot on Thursday September 02, 2021 @02:39PM (#28395728)
I never had anything serious, just sebaceous cysts and fascia inflammation. On both of those two radiologists worked on them, and everyone was pretty sure it was not cancerous or anything. I think two radiologists are standard for most things where they may recommend a biopsy.

I asked about AI and they couldn't use the one they had on the cyst because it was not trained for ankles.

Re:Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in brea... by cratermoon on Thursday September 02, 2021 @02:34PM (#28395650)
That just means the scans were easy to interpret and/or the consequences of error were not mortal. While that's most scans, the ones where we care about the most accurate results are the ones the AI is worst.