News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gab.com’s Response to Congress by JumpCrisscross on Thursday September 02, 2021 @10:19AM (#28392343)
> Before the masses were corralled into walled gardens

The total audience for the internet was far less in those days.

Re:Gab.com’s Response to Congress by Workaccount2 on Thursday September 02, 2021 @10:30AM (#28392514)
It's weird to think back to a decade or 15 years ago where it was shameful to be an "internet addict". Spending a lot of time online was generally frowned upon, and not something you would talk about.

Now the entirety of society is an "internet addict". I'll admit the nerd inside me feels a bit vindicated, even if horrified overall with where the internet has taken us.

Re:Gab.com’s Response to Congress by effingwewt on Thursday September 02, 2021 @11:05AM (#28392953)
Wow, I had forgotten that term!

The other day I was thinking back to when I was younger and people freaked out at the possibility of dating someone you met online. Now with dating apps it's the norm.

Re:Gab.com’s Response to Congress by aww_dang on Thursday September 02, 2021 @10:23AM (#28392417)
Agreed, but that isn't a rationalization of the walled garden or proof that the Internet couldn't have continued to grow without the model imposed by "platforms".

To the contrary, the Internet was still growing by leaps and bounds. I propose that the Internet had reached a point where vested interests needed to capture it to maintain control of the narrative.