Re:UK national extradited to US for film/TV piracy
by dendriti on Thursday September 02, 2021 @12:02AM
(#28388529)
If you actually read the link, Strauss is not being "extradited to another country for potential imprisonment" just for criminal copyright infringement.
Re:UK national extradited to US for film/TV piracy
by wyldfire on Thursday September 02, 2021 @08:24AM
(#28391209)
The imprisonment bit comes if he's convicted in the US.
From 17 U.S.C. 506(A) & 18 U.S.C 2319:
> . A defendant, convicted for the first time of violating 17 U.S.C. § 506(a) by the unauthorized reproduction or distribution, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, or 1 or more copyrighted works, with a retail value of more than $2,500 can be imprisoned for up to 5 years and fined up to $250,000, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2319(b), 3571(b)(3).
The idea behind a copyright is to have The People temporarily forfeit their innate right to communicate art, ideas, and stories in order to stimulate an industry of artists and scientists.
If the business model depends on people not copying your data then you can always sue for relief in the courts. Get damages, hooray. But criminal copyright infringement seems like a big stretch. Maybe worthy of fines or public service but imprisonment? Extradition to another country for potential imprisonment? Seems totally backwards.