Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t...
by ppqqrr on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @06:48PM
(#28386495)
I think people who have night sky views pure enough for satellites to become a nuisance is probably in the global minority. One might even call it a privileged pov, given that most rural inhabitants of this planet struggle for basic network connectivity needed for their livelihood and the education of their children. I respect your sentiment, though - ultimately, the question is not whether we should do it; it’s who’s gonna stop us.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t...
by olivierduval on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:14AM
(#28389461)
Well... bad night sky is really a problem in cities... where there's already fiber. But in most rural area (at least in France), the night sky is still "pure enough"...
I understand basic network connectivity problem, but I'm not sure that satellites are the right answer wrt the impacts
"ultimately, the question is not whether we should do it; it’s who’s gonna stop us". You're right... and I can't anything else but law... coming a world agreement on how to manage space around the world