Craig has been inviting people in court (including BTC devs) and is awaiting the COPA case to prove he is Satoshi, it was Peter McKormack who bailed out even though being backed by Tether (you know that endless source of money he could use to fight Craig)
It was cobra whi backed out of defending the bitcoin.org which defaulted to Craig
Instead of fighting Craig in court Tether pulled out of the case, yes Tether pulled out and no longer fights that Craig is not Satoshi after having seen the evidence.
Many others have been running as well, rather than actually fighting him in court. (Roger Ver, Adam Back, Greg Maxwell) Folks like @fluffypony and @mcafee all calling Craig a fraud, a common theme, all of them landed in jail for fraudulent behaviour.
Funnily enough Greg is one of the greatest social media engineers fighting a war against Craig but please notice how he is to much of a coward to fight him in court……
Instead he and his crypto space buddies, fight a nasty social media war by spreading misinfo on Craig (using sockpuppet accounts) to make it look like the most functional scalable and technically advanced chain(original Bitcoin with set in stone rules) is a fraud……
I filed my response to the conman's laughable $6 billion dollar lawsuit against me on June 16th, which is now almost 11 weeks ago. By comparison, I was only granted only 4 weeks to both find legal representation and respond. Wright appears to be doing almost everything in his power to delay progress in court cases. E.g. he's started claiming that covid hardships are delaying him from going to trial, ironically on a day where he gave a presentation in front of a room full of prospective investors in his scam.
In your response you don't appear to have read my message at all. You don't deny wright's disk writing claims are debunked, that the only 'evidence' he provides of performing the experiment turns out to be an image stolen from a mfgr website, that text was plagiarized, or that he can't even bother to distinguish a scientist from a rock band.
Wright has lost in court multiple times against Roger Ver. Against Adam Back wright not only failed but had to pay all of Dr. Back's legal fees. And against myself Wright appears to be doing all he can to delay responding.
> Peter McKormack who bailed out
Journalist Peter McCormack is being sued by Wright for defamation in the UK for simply repeating what everyone else had been saying for years before: That Wright's supposed evidence of being Satoshi is all obviously fake. Wright has bankrupted him with millions of UKP in legal expenses in what is apparently the most expensive defamation case in UK history ( https://twitter.com/petermccormack/status/140557825024028672... ) yet he has by no means "bailed out".
The fact that Wright is suing journalists for criticizing his obviously false claims is why it's important that people like me step up to point out the scam-- because his naked threats and intimidation prevent others from doing so.
> using sockpuppet accounts
You have a brand new pseudonymous account to post your attack. By contrast, I am publishing here under my only account, one which I've used here since 2010, which is well known and happily disclosed to be me. Sounds to me that you're applying a criticism to your targets that would be better applied to yourself.
I don't have to do anything to make it look like Wright is a fraud because it is transparently obvious that he is one, which is why multiple courts have found that his testamony was false and perjurious and that his documents were forgeries.
Rather odd for someone to pull everyone in court and fight his legacy and then postpone the cases right, he must be off of his hat to even invite you into court if he has zero chance of winning it....
After all if he can’t prove he is Satoshi the courtcase would be an act of hari kiri....
So basically your argument is, he is delaying the courts so therefor he is a fraud?
I am counterattacking your claims and I am using my oudekaas pseudonym for it, and yes I opened a new account here, nothing to do with sockpuppets or starting conversations with myself to press a certain narrative right?
Peter McKormack no longer fights the fact that Craig is not Satoshi which was originally one of his defenses, in fact despite Tether’s infinite resources, Peter McKormack is now only defending the defamation, so you are lying and misinforming people here....
It’s pretty damn obvious why McKormack dropped that defense.... they know they can’t win it.
You don’t have to do anything right? except you do EVERYTHING
Actually, in his lawsuit against me Wright's attornies write: "Whether or not Dr Wright is, in fact, Satoshi Nakamoto, is not an issue that is likely to fall for determination in the Claim."
But even ignoring that, Wright is engaging the courts because he's backed into a corner. He convinced a former drug smuggler and indicted money launderer to loan him enormous sums of money in trade for fictitious Bitcoins which he's now unable to pay up. Every lie Wright has told so far ties his hands and forces his moves, he's using the lawsuits as an excuse to not hand over the coins he's promised his victims, coins he can't hand over because they were never his and/or never existed.
Whatever negative consequences he suffers from filing wave after wave of spurious lawsuit doesn't hold a candle to what will likely happen to him when the scheme finally collapses. His only hope is to drag it out for as long as he can.
funfact, it is you that is displaying questionable obsessive behaviour towards Craig, there is no way an intelligent guy like you would spent so much effort into discrediting someone that supposedly is a non event at the same time Besides that the Bitcoin you support clearly is an experiment gone wrong, it may be around for a bit, but competing with shackles on. It is here where it becomes so obvious that BSV = Bitcoin even if you don’t believe Craig which is not required to understand that BSV is clearly Bitcoin as it was designed with set in stone rules. Game theorie wise, it is hilarious to see that BTCers crave decentralization yet, don’t grasp the easy concept of playing by a fixed rulebook. One of the main reasons to have flexible rules is for certain players to gain an advantage by changing the rules in there favour. Alas Blockstream has done exactly that, forcing Segwit down peoples throats in order to create a separate network that relies on Blockstream…
Well done Greg and friends, I applaud your success, but now I like to see the truth come out.
The fact that cryptofights is popular and working on BSV not on ETH, now doing 2 million tx a day, isn’t at all an indication of how far ahead BSV is versus the rest of the socalled “crypto” casino space, right?
BTC sits on 7 tx per sec with a broken lightning network…… BSV reached 100K transactions a sec with terra node.
BTC relies solely on price and high fees from centrally planned blocksize to survive the block reward halving, BSV already has natural demand from apps that already highlight, small blocks are a dead end given enough time
Even if Craig is not Satoshi, (he is) what will you do if BSV keeps growing and growing, will you admit you were wrong?
i watched a lot of this, gotta say it's pretty good cringe-entertainment, mostly comprised of self-aggrandizing statements and explorations of trivial comp-sci topics.
these videos used to be even more entertaining when ryan x charles was asking for details and specifics in response to craig's vague hand-waving, but recent videos no longer have ryan. wonder why.
> before the grand finalé
grand finale will be craig pleading for insanity/illness that makes him pathological liar. he already started laying ground by claiming to be autistic.
> BSV reached 100K transactions a sec with terra node
i can reach million tps on my laptop, everybody knows this number in isolation is meaningless.
I am sure you did, in the meantime, we have projects being build on BSV that actually innovate and don’t have to rely on 7 tx per sec or centralized solutions like LN strike....
Move along now please
Subpoena the list from google - en.bitcoin.it/wiki/x A known Satoshi Nakamoto Post from 2002 the posters signed in again in 2018 in front of the supporters. His minions are ill informed & offer a wild story filled with misfacts. Others point out factual data that they continue to deny.
https://twitter.com/TeamSatoshi/status/1432429656217726977/p... for the actual posting 20 years later.
The tactic is to show a promising new feature they coerced to be on the new platform and ignore the facts included as data.
He has a long history of using forgeries, faked documents, plagiarism, and impersonation in order to pass himself off as some kind of credible.
This article is debunked in the "Further Epilogue" of https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_del.html
Moreover, the images of their supposed MFM imaging was just copied off a manufacturer's page ( https://web.archive.org/web/20090418043851/https://www.engr.... shows another copy on a similarly old page, citing the source) -- so it seems unlikely that they ever performed any measurements at all. A big chunk was plagiarized from an uncited source ("A Practical Guide to Scanning Probe Microscopy (1993)")... another hallmark of Wright's lame forgeries.
There was a phenomenal twitter thread that went over all this and more, but Wright used spurious legal threats to drive the author off twitter. The biggest loss was where it pointed out that one of the citations in this paper is where they tried to cite Nikola Tesla in [20], but used the title of the 1989 album The Great Radio Controversy by the rock band Tesla ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Radio_Controversy ). :P
These days Wright is busy prolonging a lawsuit against a dozen former and current Bitcoin developers-- including myself--, demanding that they help him compensate for his lack of private keys by publishing a backdoored version of Bitcoin in order to aid him in taking billions of dollars worth of other people's coins, or failing that pay him billions of dollars themselves.
I wouldn't be shocked now if Wright wasn't promoting this article because in one of his lawsuits he claimed hackers hid a "wifi pineapple" in his home and used it to penetrate his systems and then delete his private keys. ... and then before contacting law enforcement he completely wiped his systems, helpfully destroying evidence that the supposed hack never happened and that the keys never existed. So now he's invested in the claim that deletions are never recoverable, to cover for his transparent spoliation.
He's now funded by loans taken out against his non-existing bitcoin fortune, which likely explains why he's cowardly doing everything he can to delay progress in at least five different court cases. Presumably the consequences for him will be dire when his victims start realizing the funds he promised them next existed. Esp because one of the largest sponsors is a former drug smuggler who spent a decade on the run on the DHS most wanted list.