News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Three Super-Massive Black Holes Merging Together in Our N... by CuriousSkeptic on Sunday August 29, 2021 @05:59AM (#28345520)
Was just going to say that we should perhaps start with using the term “speed of time” instead of “speed of light” to get in the right frame of mind.

But then I started to think about it and it doesn’t seem exactly right either. Causality kind of implies interaction, and interaction implies mass (no?), so causality as such must necessarily be strictly slower than C. That is, the speed of the propagation of the wave function between causally connects to events is C but causality as such are the interesting things happening at those events.

Re:Three Super-Massive Black Holes Merging Together in Our N... by dnadler on Sunday August 29, 2021 @08:36AM (#28346217)
> interaction implies mass (no?)

Not necessarily. Photons, for example, are massless. But you're still pretty much correct. Information cannot travel faster than C.

Though there may be some special cases that I'm not too familiar with. One I'm a little curious about is entangled quantum particles, though I'd have to do a little reading to be able to say anything further.

Re:Three Super-Massive Black Holes Merging Together in Our N... by wizzwizz4 on Sunday August 29, 2021 @10:47AM (#28347115)
Entangled quantum particles cannot transfer information, regardless of your interpretation.