Re:Tupolev Tu-144: The Soviets' doomed rival to Concorde (2017)
by keymone on Saturday August 28, 2021 @09:58AM
(#28338098)
What’s “the west” and how were they trying and weren’t able to match tu-160?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tupolev Tu-144: The Soviets' doomed rival to Concorde (2017)
by sudosysgen on Saturday August 28, 2021 @12:01PM
(#28339080)
The West being the US and Western Europe and the attempts were mainly the B-1A and the XB-70 both of which failed.
Re:Tupolev Tu-144: The Soviets' doomed rival to Concorde (2017)
by dralley on Saturday August 28, 2021 @06:37PM
(#28342133)
Cancellation isn't failure. By that point it was clear that non-stealth high altitude bombers were going to be completely useless within the next few years due to advances in missile technology.
Re:Tupolev Tu-144: The Soviets' doomed rival to Concorde (2017)
by sudosysgen on Sunday August 29, 2021 @12:11AM
(#28344040)
Actually, no it wasn't. What was clear was that low altitude bombers were going to become useless due to look-down shoot-down radars. High altitude and high speed bombers were and are the best non-stealth alternative.
Re:Tupolev Tu-144: The Soviets' doomed rival to Concorde (2017)
by dralley on Sunday August 29, 2021 @01:09AM
(#28344365)
>High altitude and high speed bombers were and are the best non-stealth alternative.
Which are carried by interceptor aircraft - meanwhile the long-term shift was clearly towards anti-aircraft missiles., and stealth was only a few years away. At this point the F/A-117 was already pretty far along in development.