News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by neeleshs on Thursday August 26, 2021 @12:50AM (#28310836)
I live in a single family house, I've lived in apartments. For me quality of life is way better in SFH. Don't care if house price gows down or up, won't sell this house.

It's not a popular opinion here, but quality of life is important for many of us.

Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by enaaem on Thursday August 26, 2021 @04:49AM (#28312271)
There is nothing wrong with sfh. The problem is when only sfh’s are allowed.
Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by 0x0nyandesu on Thursday August 26, 2021 @07:47AM (#28313649)
An sfh next to a high density apartment building feels a lot less like a sfh.
Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by throwaway0a5e on Thursday August 26, 2021 @09:30AM (#28314662)
When you don't pull a CA and let things grow organically there isn't much of a discontinuity so you don't get much development like that. It'll be a gradual increase from SFH in the exurbs with more and more mutlifamily and small apartment buildings increasing in density to the city core where it's basically all purpose built apartment buildings with dozens of units at a minimum.

A neighborhood that's got a lot of 2/3/4 family homes feels about the same as a SFH neighborhood if those homes have one unit occupied by the owner.

Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by cloverich on Thursday August 26, 2021 @01:09AM (#28310937)
quality of life is important for all of us. That’s the problem.