News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by 6gvONxR4sf7o on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @11:51PM (#28310449)
Isn't it more reasonable to think that maybe the people in single-family zoned neighborhoods want to live in that kind of neighborhood, completely apart from the price of their houses?
Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by shuckles on Thursday August 26, 2021 @12:07AM (#28310580)
But home values will plummet is a common bogeyman used in local zoning battles, so separating the two concepts is not as trivial as you suggest.
Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by refurb on Thursday August 26, 2021 @12:08AM (#28310591)
Precisely.

I don't know of any SF voters who think "oh yeah, I need to fight this new development so the price of my house continues to rise".

It's more like "I like the way my neighborhood is and don't want it to change".

Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by nine_k on Thursday August 26, 2021 @12:20AM (#28310676)
I'm afraid a change is inevitable. But it can be a softer change that mostly preserves what they care for, or a rough and dramatic change if no adaptive measures are taken.

I suppose that SF residents probably liked what their city was in, say, 1985, and did not want any change. Has SF changed somehow by 2020? Was in to the better?

Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by nradov on Thursday August 26, 2021 @03:57PM (#28319819)
If you talk to people who have lived in Mountain View, CA for 30+ years they aren't thrilled about Google moving in. Sure their property values are huge but quality of life is worse. Property appreciation doesn't mean much if you're not planning to sell and just want a nice place to live.
Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by wyager on Thursday August 26, 2021 @12:02AM (#28310538)
Don’t be crazy - everyone wants to live in a pod!