News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OCaml at Bloomberg by krapht on Monday August 23, 2021 @06:16PM (#28282704)
This is a pretty obnoxious way to tell me you don't work on real-time systems without explicitly saying you don't work on real-time systems.
Re:OCaml at Bloomberg by yawaramin on Monday August 23, 2021 @06:31PM (#28282840)
I didn't realize we were exclusively talking about real-time systems? Do you think people you argue with on HN are so dumb that they would go around claiming high-level GC languages are suitable for real-time systems?
Re:OCaml at Bloomberg by jolux on Monday August 23, 2021 @06:50PM (#28283046)
I feel like if your concern is real-time systems, you should probably say you don’t think it’s suitable for real-time systems, instead of talking about performance differences that no one really disagrees but which don’t matter in practice for most applications anyways.
Re:OCaml at Bloomberg by detaro on Monday August 23, 2021 @06:32PM (#28282867)
Asking about the actual requirement sounds very much like what you do in real-time systems, vs just being happy with "faster"?