The only skin care that works? science video response (2020)

Re:The only skin care that works? science video response (2020) by css on Monday August 23, 2021 @06:04PM (#28282567)

This article cherry-picks a few items and discussed how EWG interprets the ingredient safety. It does not follow that all of EWG is misinformation; dismissing the useful database of ingredients, animal testing statuses, and other data is itself misinformation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The only skin care that works? science video response (2020) by tablespoonsruby on Monday August 23, 2021 @07:50PM (#28283524)

There's plenty more criticism out there:

https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05/25/dear-ewg-why-real-scien... https://chemistscorner.com/3-reasons-the-ewg-is-dubious-reso...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The only skin care that works? science video response (2020) by css on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @12:18AM (#28285053)

Again, disagreeing with their risk assessment is one thing, but pretending the database itself is misinformation is dishonest.

[ Parent | on HN ]