News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Sweden experiment: how no lockdowns led to mental hea... by kenneth on Monday August 23, 2021 @03:26AM (#28273116)
Actually, I do trade the statistical risk of killing myself for some statistically greater benefit pretty much every single day and every action I take, from driving a car, to traveling for work, to any number of recreational activities like surfing or skiing.

Your argument is the precise fallacy I'm arguing against — risks and benefits should be quantified and weighed. The fact that it takes 50 man-months of quarantine to avoid a single one-month earlier than expected death, to me, is absolutely not worth it.

Perhaps you think locking up 50 innocent people to give someone an extra month is worth it. I don't. But I do understand that it's a subjective assessment.

Re:The Sweden experiment: how no lockdowns led to mental hea... by thebruce87m on Monday August 23, 2021 @05:26PM (#28282197)
“… each life cut short by 10 years on average”

https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/news/1.5-million-...

Re:The Sweden experiment: how no lockdowns led to mental hea... by kenneth on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @05:18AM (#28286551)
Yes, lock up 6000 people for one month to save one life that had 10 years left.

Still not worth it to me.

Re:The Sweden experiment: how no lockdowns led to mental hea... by thebruce87m on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @05:21AM (#28286565)
Ok, how many years would be worth it?
Re:The Sweden experiment: how no lockdowns led to mental hea... by dent9876543 on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @01:33PM (#28292198)
Logically it has to be 600, no? Which makes no sense.

But doesn’t it place a reasonable scale upon what a trade might look like.