News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One does not simply calculate the absolute value by andi999 on Sunday August 22, 2021 @04:33PM (#28269330)
Couldn't you also implement max as return a>b? a:b;

(changing greater equal to just greater). Would the problem then still persist?

Re:One does not simply calculate the absolute value by kmm on Sunday August 22, 2021 @04:46PM (#28269452)
Positive and negative zero cannot be distinguished by normal equality checks, meaning +0.0 == -0.0. Therefore, for consistency's sake +0.0 > -0.0 ought to be false, which would yield a return value of -0.0 for max(+0.0, -(+0.0))
Re:One does not simply calculate the absolute value by gvx on Sunday August 22, 2021 @04:50PM (#28269477)
That wouldn't solve it: max(0.0, -0.0) would be false ? 0.0 : -0.0

The problem is that 0.0 == -0.0. As long as you don't take care of signed zero, you cannot guarantee that abs(x) has no negative sign.