News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Janet Programming Language by tyingq on Saturday August 21, 2021 @10:51AM (#28257463)
I imagine they are annoyed because it used to be more clear, easier to google, etc. The discussion and search space was polluted for them as the meaning of the term changed, and no new term filled the void.
Re:Janet Programming Language by auxym on Saturday August 21, 2021 @11:25AM (#28257736)
"microcontroller" seems like a term that would differentiate from things like embedded Linux and SoCs.
Re:Janet Programming Language by detaro on Saturday August 21, 2021 @10:58AM (#28257523)
When was that? The range wasn't as large because the top end was way more limited, but the same thing applied at least since the 90s.
Re:Janet Programming Language by tyingq on Saturday August 21, 2021 @11:02AM (#28257563)
My impression in the 90s is that most people talking about embedded were talking about microcontrollers or very limited microprocessors.
Re:Janet Programming Language by detaro on Saturday August 21, 2021 @06:14PM (#28261032)
My counterpoints would be e.g. QNX and vxWorks, famous embedded OSes, both being active in the 90s (roots go to the 80s, but in both cases afaik they really came into being and found a market in the 90s). Plenty 90s embedded hardware with x86 CPUs in it.

What's probably different today is that you have more options also on MCUs (not just assembly and maybe C), because MCUs have grown.