"SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed to replace fopen()."

Re:"SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed... by nodata on Saturday July 30, 2011 @07:20AM (#2825512)

I disagree with you completely.

I've worked places where there is a rule that "The Corporate Database is Oracle and Oracle Only". Any mention of database _at_all_ will mean someone will ensure that The Corporate Database is used. It doesn't matter if Postgres or SQLite would be a cheaper/better choice.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed... by tluyben2 on Saturday July 30, 2011 @10:37AM (#2825847)

I'm seeing this too ; the choice is company-wide, the licenses are bought company wide. And yes it would save money in many departmental apps; no-one seems to care.

[ Parent | on HN ]