News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Generics enabled by default in Go tip by dmitriid on Saturday August 21, 2021 @02:19AM (#28254698)
> Generics would let you enforce the type of `foo` at compile time, but it wouldn't save you many lines of code.

You literally showed that "for each type of paged object, you write <multiple lines of entirely unnecessary code>".

Where with generics you just have a single generic function.

> We hand-wave over that in the above example with

The problem is: there's no hand-waving in reality.

Re:Generics enabled by default in Go tip by dmitriid on Saturday August 21, 2021 @08:07AM (#28256310)
I'm traveling, so can't properly expand on what I said, but without generics the choice was:

- repeat unnecessary bolierplate code for every single return type

- skip types completely and use a function that accepts interface{} as a parameter and assigns whatever to that variable

Neither are really acceptable in my opinion. And both will be greatly simplified and improved by generics.