Re:"SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed...
by karambahh on Saturday July 30, 2011 @03:39AM
(#2825185)
When you need multiple spatially distributed active/active write nodes (multiple masters...) you pretty much need Oracle RAC.
When confronted with the cost, you end up designing something where writes are pushed to a caching layer, which deals with an active/passive setup, with enough buffer to switch passive to active if something goes wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:"SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed...
by jacques_chester on Saturday July 30, 2011 @04:56AM
(#2825319)
DB2 and Teradata boast comparable degrees of horizontal, multi-site scalability.
Re:"SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed...
by karambahh on Saturday July 30, 2011 @10:39AM
(#2825849)
And DB2 cost pretty much the same as Oracle... :p
Re:"SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed...
by jacques_chester on Saturday July 30, 2011 @11:59AM
(#2826014)
Less, usually, depending on the platform. IBM mostly uses DB2 to sell its fancier hardware.
But occasionally you gotta spend money to make money.