News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A lot of people are getting the OnlyFans story wrong by slippery_bridge on Friday August 20, 2021 @03:29PM (#28250359)
Paying somebody to do something physical and paying somebody to physically use their body are two completely different things
Re:A lot of people are getting the OnlyFans story wrong by denton-scratch on Saturday August 21, 2021 @05:13AM (#28255441)
I think parent means "paying somebody so that you can physically use their body".

Clearly, paying somebody to use their own body to e.g. pitch hay for you isn't much different from paying them to use their own body to do any other kind of physical labour for you.

Paying people to be physically intimate with you is definitely different. But it's worth considering cases that don't involve sex: carers dress you, they wash you, including your sex organs and your arse, and they clean up after you.

All that is definitely physically intimate - arguably much more intimate than a 15-minute bump-and-grind session with a person that despises you.

Re:A lot of people are getting the OnlyFans story wrong by johnnyanmac on Saturday August 21, 2021 @04:13AM (#28255169)
If the two parties consent to the action and transaction, there's no business difference. governments have just decided one action is illegal while the other not.
Re:A lot of people are getting the OnlyFans story wrong by neolog on Friday August 20, 2021 @04:00PM (#28250719)
I don't think that distinction is useful on this question. Lots of non-sex physical work involves just being present, and lots of sex work involves skill.
Re:A lot of people are getting the OnlyFans story wrong by rendall on Saturday August 21, 2021 @04:39AM (#28255287)
> Paying somebody to do something physical and paying somebody to physically use their body are two completely different things

I think if we were to explore and expand on this we would find the distinction to be non-existent. How and in what way are they different at all?