Re:Celebrating Gene Roddenberry's 100th Birthday
by vanderZwan on Friday August 20, 2021 @07:35AM
(#28244899)
Are you talking about Discovery? I mean, the first season was rough but doesn't every first season of Star Trek get a mulligan?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Celebrating Gene Roddenberry's 100th Birthday
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Friday August 20, 2021 @07:52AM
(#28245013)
Unfortunately for Discovery, they fucked up 3 seasons in a row. They almost made Season 3 work, then threw away everything in the last episode. I, for one, am done giving that show chances.
Re:Celebrating Gene Roddenberry's 100th Birthday
by ragingrobot on Friday August 20, 2021 @09:43AM
(#28245825)
I thought S2 was at least tolerable. The character of Christopher Pike seemed far more stable and realistic than the rest, and made it enjoyable. Somehow Mount appeared to have brought the crew to the same, more even, level.
Then (ughh) they brought the Enterprise back for a 2 episode Star Wars wannabe. That should have been my clue things were going back down hill.
Season three was just intolerable, IMHO.
Re:Celebrating Gene Roddenberry's 100th Birthday
by johnlorentzson on Friday August 20, 2021 @07:46AM
(#28244977)
Season 2 started off better but quickly deteriorated (shortly after lots of positive reviews were in), and I completely forgot about Season 3 after I'd heard it existed.