Re:Why it’s difficult to build teams in high growth organisa...
by absolute100 on Thursday August 19, 2021 @04:13PM
(#28238763)
Jason Yip shares his observations for scaling software teams during hyper growth (and what not to do). I liked his insight on group structure alignment with the stability of the group's strategy: "Structure should be stable where strategy is stable; structure should be flexible where strategy is volatile. For example, if a broader department-level product strategy is stable while more local tactics are volatile, you should want the structure and shared identity of the department to be stronger and more stable than team-level structures and identities."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why it’s difficult to build teams in high growth organisa...
by jasonpeacock on Thursday August 19, 2021 @05:18PM
(#28239495)
So...Conway's Law :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_law
There is also the "reverse-Conway maneuver": Structure the org to produce the results you want.
Re:Why it’s difficult to build teams in high growth organisa...
by jameshart on Thursday August 19, 2021 @11:21PM
(#28242171)
But there's also a danger: if the only tool leadership can think of to affect how things get done is to redraw the org chart, you get management-through-reverse-Conway.
There are other ways to tell people how to behave than shifting their reporting lines, but some leaders haven't heard of them.
Re:Why it’s difficult to build teams in high growth organisa...
by disgruntledphd2 on Friday August 20, 2021 @04:11AM
(#28243807)
Yeah, completely agreed.
I actually like the strategy outlined in the OP (Absorb and Split). When this has happened, it's always lead to a much better outcome than when you start splitting and creating teams prematurely.
Re:Why it’s difficult to build teams in high growth organisa...
by hinkley on Thursday August 19, 2021 @07:14PM
(#28240519)
I haven’t gotten to use it much, but it does seem to work for network services as well. But then it’s a fine line between reverse Conway and Gandhi (be the change).
You can stand up a sane thing that you enjoy interacting with and then maneuver to have the org and systems match that new structure.