Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash collisions. Parent comment
Did we do this already? If not, why did we assume this didn't exist previously?
>Is the inevitable Samsung version of this system going to be as privacy-preserving?
I don't see how this is Apple's fault. Be angry at Samsung for their system. I don't blame Snap if I have a problem with Instagram Stories.
>How are we sure the hash list isn't tainted?
How did we know the hash list wasn't tainted when doing this comparison on Apple's servers?
>All of these problems are solved by one principle: Don't put the backdoor code in the OS to begin with.
Apple controls the hardware, software, and cloud services. The backdoor didn't need to exist in the OS for there to be a backdoor.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
Did we do this already? If not, why did we assume this didn't exist previously?
>Is the inevitable Samsung version of this system going to be as privacy-preserving?
I don't see how this is Apple's fault. Be angry at Samsung for their system. I don't blame Snap if I have a problem with Instagram Stories.
>How are we sure the hash list isn't tainted?
How did we know the hash list wasn't tainted when doing this comparison on Apple's servers?
>All of these problems are solved by one principle: Don't put the backdoor code in the OS to begin with.
Apple controls the hardware, software, and cloud services. The backdoor didn't need to exist in the OS for there to be a backdoor.