Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co...
by duskwuff on Thursday August 19, 2021 @02:35PM
(#28237517)
Except that there's a threshold involved. A single matching file doesn't trigger an investigation; it takes multiple (10+, maybe more?) matches to do that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co...
by kemayo on Thursday August 19, 2021 @02:38PM
(#28237560)
In the interview Craig Federighi gave on Friday, he said 30.[1] I have no idea if he was just throwing a number out or if that's the actual threshold.
[1]: https://tidbits.com/2021/08/13/new-csam-detection-details-em...
Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co...
by duskwuff on Thursday August 19, 2021 @02:57PM
(#28237813)
Either way, it's high enough that adding a single file to the set wouldn't be a useful way of finding people who have that file. One attack I can imagine would be to add a whole set of closely related photos (e.g. images posted online by a known dissident) to identify the person who took them, and even that would be a stretch.