Re:"SQLite is not designed to replace Oracle. It is designed...
by owenmarshall on Friday July 29, 2011 @04:25PM
(#2823655)
Wow. Not only did you manage to completely miss the point of that statement, but you cast it up as a hasty strawman to boot. I'm quite impressed.
The choice of fopen() and Oracle was meant to convey simplicity: SQLite solves problems on the simple end of the difficulty spectrum -- problems you would normally solve with fopen(). It is not for problems at the complex end, like Oracle. It's a simplified expression; reading it literally is foolish.
The choice of fopen() and Oracle was meant to convey simplicity: SQLite solves problems on the simple end of the difficulty spectrum -- problems you would normally solve with fopen(). It is not for problems at the complex end, like Oracle. It's a simplified expression; reading it literally is foolish.