How AI-powered tech landed man in jail with scant evidence

Re:How AI-powered tech landed man in jail with scant evidence by BXLE_1-1-BitIs1 on Thursday August 19, 2021 @12:20PM (#28235778)

Nothing that's not peer reviewed and openly published should be admissible in court.

Let's also remember that judges, lawyers and cops are folks that couldn't hack STEM.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How AI-powered tech landed man in jail with scant evidence by extra88 on Thursday August 19, 2021 @12:49PM (#28236165)

> folks that couldn't hack STEM

Your first point was good but spoiled by this ad hominem attack. Being interested in STEM fields doesn't make one any smarter, or otherwise superior, to anyone else.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How AI-powered tech landed man in jail with scant evidence by BXLE_1-1-BitIs1 on Thursday August 19, 2021 @06:35PM (#28240228)

There's a big difference between interest and competence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How AI-powered tech landed man in jail with scant evidence by extra88 on Thursday August 19, 2021 @07:36PM (#28240649)

You’re still clinging to the absurd assumption that everyone wants to work in STEM and the only reason one wouldn’t work in STEM is because they couldn’t “hack it.”

Not everyone who works in STEM is even competent at it, for most roles it is not required. You have probably encountered some of them yet they’re still employed.

What is necessary to work in any field is an interest in doing so, that’s why I chose that word.

[ Parent | on HN ]