Re:Lex Fridman at the Joe Rogan Experience [audio]
by AlbertCory on Thursday August 19, 2021 @12:16PM
(#28235718)
As the sibling says: I can skim over the boring, boilerplate stuff ("thanks for having me") much faster in a transcript.
Since I can see the whole thing, it's much easier to skip down to the more interesting stuff, or realize that there isn't any.
Re:Lex Fridman at the Joe Rogan Experience [audio]
by QuadmasterXLII on Thursday August 19, 2021 @01:22PM
(#28236646)
A typical podcast is 150 to 200 words per minute, while many on hacker news read at north of 600 words per minute.
Re:Lex Fridman at the Joe Rogan Experience [audio]
by kradeelav on Thursday August 19, 2021 @02:13PM
(#28237266)
I'm not the original poster, but I have bad hearing and exclusively read transcripts over listening to podcasts - can't tell you how many times I've been grateful when podcasters provide even a partial list of transcripts for episodes. Speed-reading is also a lot faster overall versus simple listening.
Re:Lex Fridman at the Joe Rogan Experience [audio]
by imaginariet on Thursday August 19, 2021 @11:38AM
(#28235225)
You would be surprised, but reading a transcript is much faster than listening, even on speedup (1.25x, 1.5x, )
You can also quickly scan ahead, or reread a sentence. Navigating audio is harder.
How would having a transcript save you time? Wouldn't it take more or less the same amount of time (+/- 25%) to read through the transcript? Would you rather CTRL+F for a few terms? Or just quickly glance through it?
Asking, because I'm interested in the podcast space overall.
Thanks.