Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ...
by onethought on Thursday August 19, 2021 @07:08AM
(#28232417)
What’s the double speak? It’s quite clear they are trying to maintain e2e encryption while also achieving CSAM scanning. Google/Facebook/Microsoft do this by scanning everything unencrypted. Apple do it while maintaining encryption and are being punished for it. It’s insane.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ...
by Zak on Thursday August 19, 2021 @07:15AM
(#28232468)
iCloud is not end-to-end encrypted, and Apple has not announced plans to add that option. Apple has the technical ability to scan images on the server.
Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ...
by jgreen401 on Sunday August 22, 2021 @10:26PM
(#28271746)
iCloud (at least for photos) is (effectively) "end to end encrypted". All photos are encrypted or decrypted only on the device (or after being downloaded to a browser), they never exist as human viewable files on iCloud. No one, except the owner of the account, can decrypt the file.
This is why the checking for illegal file has to happen before they are upload. It cannot be done on the server, the encrypted file can never match the hash. What Apple has done that is real genius is that for each image identified as illegal, a part of the key is encrypted and sent with the file to Apple. After a threshold is met, the account is locked, the user notified of the appeals process, and Apple can decrypt and have the files verified. 1 or 2 false positives changes nothing.
Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ...
by onethought on Thursday August 19, 2021 @10:08AM
(#28234004)
Yes, they have the ability, but they found a way NOT to do that. Instead maintaining user privacy. And the world hates them for it, and would prefer they just unencrypted and scanned everything… doesn’t make sense.