The Zettelkasten Method (2019)

Re:The Zettelkasten Method (2019) by andi999 on Thursday August 19, 2021 @01:54AM (#28230785)

Tried understanding Zettelkasten for a while, searched the internet, bought one/some books. But it was always too light on examples. I need full beefed out examples (like a 100 pages Zettelkasten) or let's say 10 pages. Of course you can say one doesn't need it, but isn't the value of any method to be benificial if done as designed?

This article seems to be the closest of having good examples.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Zettelkasten Method (2019) by __bjoernd on Thursday August 19, 2021 @02:23AM (#28230949)

You might want to check out the Obsidian.md forums. Obviously, focusing on Obsidian as a note taking tool, but they have sections where users demonstrate their workflows: https://forum.obsidian.md

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Zettelkasten Method (2019) by pps on Thursday August 19, 2021 @04:19AM (#28231561)

You can see the process on videos from zettelkasten.de guy: entire playlist https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHwtkAtdkx1IZoI7FZf1X... and something new that I didn't watch yet, but it looks like it's also walkthrough, from the other guy from zk.de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_MJYtWr1vE

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Zettelkasten Method (2019) by sdoering on Thursday August 19, 2021 @02:33AM (#28231022)

If you are able to read handwritten German, the whole Zettelkasten [1] of Niklas Luhmann [2] is online available. with an additional explanation of the method [3].

[1]: https://niklas-luhmann-archiv.de/bestand/zettelkasten/zettel...

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklas_Luhmann

[3]: https://niklas-luhmann-archiv.de/nachlass/zettelkasten

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Zettelkasten Method (2019) by andi999 on Thursday August 19, 2021 @03:24AM (#28231290)

Yes, but I fear that this is actually too much Infos (and I am not interested in his field)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Zettelkasten Method (2019) by sdoering on Thursday August 19, 2021 @05:17AM (#28231832)

I strongly believe one can't understand this method and the sheer amount of effort necessary to consistently tend to this system and keep it alive (like Luhmann) did without the deep explanations and also at least diving into the examples of Luhmann's zettelkasten as it is digitalized.

Nonetheless - I also do not believe, that a lot of people would benefit from the zettelkasten system. It has in my opinion a very narrow target group that would massively benefit from this method, while for others it would only be a lot of work with limited benefit.

Luhmann profited from his lifelong work on the Zettelkasten (he was an avid reader and did extracts long before his university career). But once he started his university career he was able to produce on such a deep level and with such a high frequency, because he had up front invested massive amounts of time into this system.

So if one is looking for a productivity tool, I am not sure that zettelkasten is the right tool in one's belt. It needs massive investment up front and pays interest only later.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Zettelkasten Method (2019) by dSebastien on Thursday August 19, 2021 @08:57AM (#28233250)

I personally look at this method (and others) as means to help keeping track of discoveries and knowledge in general. I believe that it is useful for all knowledge workers, but especially for academics & content creators.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Zettelkasten Method (2019) by andi999 on Thursday August 19, 2021 @12:53PM (#28236233)

Looks to me only good for academics who can discover new things from old texts. Not sure how it help Stem research.

[ Parent | on HN ]