News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model. Parent comment

Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by teachrdan on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @07:52PM (#28228709)
The more collisions, the more chances of a false positive by a (tired, underpaid) human. I don't envy the innocent person whose home gets raided by a SWAT team convinced they're busting a child sex trafficker.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by hda2 on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @10:57PM (#28229855)
The database is known to contain non-csam images like porn. I doubt the reviewer will be qualified to discern which is which.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by jgreen401 on Sunday August 22, 2021 @10:35PM (#28271789)
Known by whom to contain legal images? The "reviewer" might well be a retired Pediatrician who can identify the age of the subject by looking at the photographs and will be extremely accurate.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by Operyl on Thursday August 19, 2021 @06:53AM (#28232328)
Not that I doubt your motives, but can I get your source on this? It seems like a huge blunder if so.
[ Parent | on HN ]