Re:Best RealSense replacements?
by CyberDildonics on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @07:39PM
(#28228593)
That's like saying instead of riding in a car, you are going to get a wheelbarrow and be pulled by an even bigger car. It's absurd to say that is a replacement.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Best RealSense replacements?
by fxtentacle on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @07:51PM
(#28228695)
Not quite. It's like instead of buying a car, you buy wheels and a frame and do a car mechanic training. With a bit of effort and skill, you'll end up with a car, but it won't look like a factory-produced car.
Re:Best RealSense replacements?
by CyberDildonics on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @08:17PM
(#28228883)
There is no universe where what you described ends up being similar to an integrated product with a dedicated ASIC. What you are saying is a stab in the dark that isn't backed up by real results.
Re:Best RealSense replacements?
by fxtentacle on Thursday August 19, 2021 @04:31AM
(#28231623)
Quite a lot of hobbyists are going that route instead of purchasing a RealSense camera:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfklQ-O-FPc
Also, I believe Amazon went that way when designing their DeepRacer. Note that it has no IR projector but 2 Cameras and a commodity PC for processing.
Re:Best RealSense replacements?
by CyberDildonics on Thursday August 19, 2021 @12:51PM
(#28236187)
Those results are not even remotely close to Intel's cameras let alone the azure kinect, yet it will be much more power hungry.
The resolution, noise, frame rate and even consistency (notice the flashing) is a tiny fraction of basic hardware solutions.