Re:Sidney Powell’s 'Intelligence Contractor' Witness Sues Do...
by thepasswordis on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @10:59PM
(#28229864)
I would trust it approximately as much as I trust voting machines which aren’t built on open source platforms.
Re:Sidney Powell’s 'Intelligence Contractor' Witness Sues Do...
by h_anna_h on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @02:50PM
(#28225547)
Given that most computers are already backdoored before you buy them and that they spend more than 1 week with the manufacturer I would say that this is an argument against electronic election machines.
I honestly never understood why anyone (except these who manufacture them) would support their use.
Re:Sidney Powell’s 'Intelligence Contractor' Witness Sues Do...
by myWindoonn on Friday August 20, 2021 @10:00PM
(#28253404)
Could you show your homework? In particular, how many is "most", and which manufacturers and chip lines are affected?
Re:Sidney Powell’s 'Intelligence Contractor' Witness Sues Do...
by h_anna_h on Monday August 23, 2021 @04:25PM
(#28281435)
You are not my teacher.
Re:Sidney Powell’s 'Intelligence Contractor' Witness Sues Do...
by myWindoonn on Monday August 23, 2021 @08:04PM
(#28283627)
Never claimed to be. You claim to have an argument, and I want to know more details. Of course, if you don't have evidence to support your argument...
Re:Sidney Powell’s 'Intelligence Contractor' Witness Sues Do...
by h_anna_h on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @01:18PM
(#28291953)
Try to be politer next time and you might just get what you seek.
Re:Sidney Powell’s 'Intelligence Contractor' Witness Sues Do...
by myWindoonn on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @08:37PM
(#28296782)
Tone policing is boring. It sounds like you don't have evidence. Stop spreading anti-democratic propaganda; you sound like a cryptofascist.
Now instead assume I am only given 10 minutes with your computer, and not even the computer it self, just a touch screen with no access to any of the physical ports, and I'm only allowed to use a very limited guest account that can only run one program that is auto run and the account logs out if that program closes. Would you feel safe using that computer afterwards?
> Shouldn't these machines simply be able to get a new image written to them and be good to go?
If you lose trust in the hardware there is next to nothing you can do in software to rectify the problem. The quote "no methods exist to adequately secure them" might be going to far, but it's entirely reasonable to say it would be cheaper to buy 5 new machines than it would be to fully verify and recertify 1 of the spoiled machines.