Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model
by cyanite on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @04:52PM
(#28226981)
> Are you actually arguing in good faith here at all?
Are you? Because you just seemed to claim that it could match against innocent pictures of your naked children, but this tells me that you don’t understand that this system looks for known pictures, not for something that looks like naked children.
Edit: if you do, apologies, but then I’d say that Apple has suggested that it’s a low resolution version of the picture. This should be contrasted with server side scanning, where the server accesses all pictures fully.
Are you actually arguing in good faith here at all? Because I can't see how a "visual derivative" that's nevertheless good enough for manual confirmation is any better than the source image?