News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by Grustaf on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @10:00AM (#28221006)
Except that Apple will review the photos once you've matched 30 of them, so it's still not possible for the government to misuse it.
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by short_sells_poo on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @10:47AM (#28221716)
So some underpaid contractor reviewing "visual derivatives" that may or may not be CSAM completely prevents governments from misusing this in your mind?
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by Grustaf on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @12:18PM (#28223423)
Considering how high profile and incredibly sensitive this is, I doubt they will hire an underpaid contractor. It's the opposite of app review, where the volume is very high but the stakes are low.
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by MichaelGroves on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @12:46PM (#28223810)
Facebook hires underpaid and poorly treated contractors to moderate exactly this same kind of content. I see no reason to believe Apple will be any different, particularly a few months from now when the general public's attention has shifted to other matters (assuming they're even paying attention right now. I don't think the interests of HN are necessarily representative of the general public..)
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by kps on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @10:10AM (#28221105)
In China, iCloud is run by the government.
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by Grustaf on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @10:16AM (#28221210)
It's actually not, but even if it were, that would be yet another reason CSAM scanning is completely irrelevant for government spying.

Any spying really. It's much easier to just look at the images themselves.

Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model by ttflee on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @11:29AM (#28222564)
> It's actually not

It's Joe Wong's joke, that it's like peeing in the snow in a dark winter night, while there is a difference but it's really hard to tell.