Re:The Inconsistency of Arithmetic (2011)
by wutbrodo on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @12:39AM
(#28206292)
> reading after only hitting two birthdays is the stuff of legend.
I don't think this is quite true. I started reading shortly after my third birthday, and I don't think I just missed the cutoff for "legend".
Though any one or two of Tao's other accomplishments fairly easily clear that bar, IMO.
Re:The Inconsistency of Arithmetic (2011)
by sdiupIGPWEfh on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @09:43PM
(#28216875)
Echoing others, hyperlexia is a thing, and reading by age 2 isn't really all that special. I was reading by age two and a half, and my own kid was reading just before turning two. I'm no genius, while she's definitely sharp but not gifted.
Re:The Inconsistency of Arithmetic (2011)
by jamesdmiller on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @10:26AM
(#28210186)
Children with hyperlexia can often learn to read before they are two. I personally knew a children who before the age of two was reading.
Re:The Inconsistency of Arithmetic (2011)
by spoonjim on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @12:14AM
(#28206173)
My son was reading at age 2. Was definitely not doing calculus at 7.
Re:The Inconsistency of Arithmetic (2011)
by eyelidlessness on Monday August 16, 2021 @11:15PM
(#28205794)
This is the correct takeaway! Go learn and explore!
Re:The Inconsistency of Arithmetic (2011)
by thaumasiotes on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @01:08AM
(#28206423)
> Unless he was born on February 29th (good luck getting that drink at a bar), reading after only hitting two birthdays is the stuff of legend.
No it isn't. I would have called it "normal".
That said, having been told so by a genius, I feel like I'm now unshackled, ready to pursue a life of mathematics as a non-genius.