News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The time Pepsi got sued for a $33M fighter jet. Parent comment

Re:The time Pepsi got sued for a $33M fighter jet by billytetrud on Monday August 16, 2021 @08:03PM (#28204484)
1) Ok. And the intent at time of advertising was always not to see the jet. So I don't see your point. Still seems to apply at the time of advertising.

2) They did indeed not ever intend to sell the thing advertised. So again, what are you talking about?

I dunno man, I guess I just disagree.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The time Pepsi got sued for a $33M fighter jet by billytetrud on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @01:33AM (#28206526)
> the court ruled that no one could reasonably view it as an offer to make the jet available as a reward

And I told you I think they were wrong.

> Even if that wasn't the case, what is the substitute product?

All of the other garbage they sold for Pepsi points...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The time Pepsi got sued for a $33M fighter jet by dragonwriter on Monday August 16, 2021 @08:58PM (#28204867)
> And the intent at time of advertising was always not to see the jet

And the court ruled that no one could reasonably view it as an offer to make the jet available as a reward.

Even if that wasn't the case, what is the substitute product?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The time Pepsi got sued for a $33M fighter jet by billytetrud on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @01:21PM (#28212386)
> the court ruled that no one could reasonably view it as an offer to make the jet available as a reward And I told you I think they were wrong.

> Even if that wasn't the case, what is the substitute product?

All of the other garbage they sold for Pepsi points...

[ Parent | on HN ]