Re:Jury awards Optis $300M in second patent trial against Apple
by trhway on Saturday August 14, 2021 @05:17AM
(#28179275)
are those patents part of the 3G/4G standards? I mean getting yourself a piece of patent portfolio of a widespread standard which everybody has to implement - that isn't plain trolling, it is extortion.
Re:Jury awards Optis $300M in second patent trial against Apple
by igorzx31 on Saturday August 14, 2021 @08:40AM
(#28180174)
patents that are part of the 3G/4G standard have to be licensed on a FRAND basis (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory).
Re:Jury awards Optis $300M in second patent trial against Apple
by alphabetter on Saturday August 14, 2021 @09:56AM
(#28180645)
It is more subtle that that. Patent holders who contributed to the 3G/4G/5G standards agree to make their standards essential patents available under FRAND terms. However, this does not apply to patent holders who have not contributed to the 3G/4G/5G standards (because they are not part of any agreement about patent licensing terms for the standard).
Re:Jury awards Optis $300M in second patent trial against Apple
by rasz on Saturday August 14, 2021 @02:54PM
(#28183066)
Those sure as shit look like SEPs issued by Samsung/LG/Panasonic. Here similar case from Europe
https://www.essentialpatentblog.com/2018/03/magistrate-judge...
Re:Jury awards Optis $300M in second patent trial against Apple
by staticautomatic on Saturday August 14, 2021 @01:44PM
(#28182553)
They still end up being the subject of jury trials, and the outcome is often not FRAND.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8019332B2/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US8385284B2/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US8411557B2/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US9001774B2/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US8102833B2/en