WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases

Re:WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first... by rcurry on Friday August 13, 2021 @05:20PM (#28174682)

Well, we do block them on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first... by aesh2Xa1 on Friday August 13, 2021 @05:53PM (#28175036)

What are you talking about (serious)? Dissent is legal and will not result in imprisonment in the US.

I don't even subscribe to Facebook or Twitter by choice. I definitely wouldn't subscribe to imprisonment by choice, haha. If you're concerned about these platforms controlling their content privately, don't use them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first... by curation on Saturday August 14, 2021 @12:52AM (#28178051)

Assange?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first... by quantum_magpie on Friday August 13, 2021 @06:08PM (#28175236)

Well, the US seems hellbent on shipping one journalist who broke no law in US to their torture chambers. Until that's sorted out you just can't claim moral superiority.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first... by rcurry on Friday August 13, 2021 @06:36PM (#28175618)

Forget it Jake, it’s Chinatown.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first... by diragon on Saturday August 14, 2021 @02:50AM (#28178643)

This is of course a joke, come on you guys. Nobody seriously compares jailing people to blocking them on social media.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first... by rcurry on Sunday August 15, 2021 @06:03PM (#28192960)

It’s the thought that counts, the social media platforms that ban you would gladly put you in a gulag if they could.

[ Parent | on HN ]