That said, it seems pretty unproductive at this point to blame anyone, but it does seem productive to avoid it happening again.
Years of propaganda has worked its magic in far more sinister ways than any of us want to admit, especially to ourselves.
* P(agressivley blame china | american lab leak of gain of function)
Not a 0 on that one.
Or are you in bad faith giving dubious priors?
"This lack of openness caused delays in efforts to control the epidemic, resulting in criticism of the People's Republic of China from the international community. China officially apologized for early slowness in dealing with the SARS epidemic."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_acute_respiratory_syndr...
My experience in biology labs (though not virology labs) suggests that a leak of benign research is plausible, and that if it did happen odds are good that there wouldn't be a ton of documentation to suppress. Mistakes happen all the time, and if researchers filled out a report every time a tube was dropped or some PPE was ignored in a "pretty safe" scenario, there'd be almost no time for research.
I still think the total number of human-animal contacts outside the lab are at least an order of magnitude greater than inside of it, so I would rank the probabilities as (natural > benign research leak >> gain of function leak).
I don't find it suspicious at all, precisely because I don't trust the Chinese government. In my estimation of the CPC, the following probabilities are all roughly equal (and close to 1):
* P(suppress investigation | natural origin)
* P(suppress investigation | lab leak of benign research)
* P(suppress investigation | lab leak of gain of function)
From a Bayesian point of view, then, P(lab leak | suppress investigation) is going to be almost equal to P(lab leak).