News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Hotelling’s Game, or Why Gas Stations Have Competitors Nearby. Parent comment

Re:Hotelling’s Game, or Why Gas Stations Have Competitors Ne... by orky56 on Thursday July 28, 2011 @01:18AM (#2815502)
Completely agree. Just to point out the logic you are using, for each factor that you deem relevant (i.e. now bile in addition to beauty), an exhaustive combination of factors will be the minimum viable strategy since it will fit better. I could continue to list additional factors in addition to these two and those additional ones would also be part of the minimum viable strategy.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hotelling’s Game, or Why Gas Stations Have Competitors Ne... by jacques_chester on Thursday July 28, 2011 @01:33AM (#2815528)
The point I guess I was making was that this is part of the minimum viable strategy because Hotelling's Law applies only weakly in the voluntary voting case.
[ Parent | on HN ]