Re:U.S. Kids Are Getting Nearly 70% of Their Calories from '...
by eurasiantiger on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @07:36PM
(#28136162)
Yes. Coincidently, most modern cow milk is not really good for you.
Re:U.S. Kids Are Getting Nearly 70% of Their Calories from '...
by legerdemain on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @09:13PM
(#28136779)
That's right, paleo cows produced keto-friendly milk back in the stone age.
Re:U.S. Kids Are Getting Nearly 70% of Their Calories from '...
by eurasiantiger on Wednesday August 11, 2021 @01:42AM
(#28138449)
Ha ha, I maek funny coment.
You know cows didn’t change, we just started separating the milk and reconstructing milk-like products. The classic Simpsons ”Malk” gag is not far off.
Re:U.S. Kids Are Getting Nearly 70% of Their Calories from '...
by ac29 on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @06:53PM
(#28135794)
> soy milk, which additionally has gelling agents added to control mouthfeel
I'm sure all brands differ, but the box in my fridge says "Ingredients: Water, Organic Soybeans".
Re:U.S. Kids Are Getting Nearly 70% of Their Calories from '...
by voakbasda on Wednesday August 11, 2021 @10:31AM
(#28142454)
AFAIK, if the amount of an ingredient is small enough, it does not need to be listed on the packaging. The label is not authoritatively inclusive. Food for thought.
Re:U.S. Kids Are Getting Nearly 70% of Their Calories from '...
by Arrath on Wednesday August 11, 2021 @01:42PM
(#28145150)
Example, Tic Tac mints are essentially entirely sugar yet fall under that threshold so the nutritional information reads '0g' of sugar per serving.
Re:U.S. Kids Are Getting Nearly 70% of Their Calories from '...
by foolfoolz on Wednesday August 11, 2021 @11:09AM
(#28142936)
yes. very similar to how “organic” constitutes a range of acceptable values and does not mean all ingredients are organic (and organic itself does not mean zero pesticides/chemicals)
That's a heck of a broad definition!