News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wildfire restored a Yosemite watershed by mandelbrotwurst on Monday August 09, 2021 @03:47PM (#28121501)
What is recolonization in this context? Does it just mean growth of a new forest?
Re:Wildfire restored a Yosemite watershed by masklinn on Monday August 09, 2021 @04:08PM (#28121735)
Well yes and no. If the soil's been sterilised the entire thing needs to be rebuilt from the grasses upwards, forests don't spring up out of nowhere they build up from precursors.
Re:Wildfire restored a Yosemite watershed by mandelbrotwurst on Monday August 09, 2021 @05:50PM (#28122744)
Thanks, I was imagining the smaller stuff as being part of the forest but I suppose maybe the plants that arise first don’t necessarily stick around for the entirety of the forest lifecycle?
Re:Wildfire restored a Yosemite watershed by masklinn on Monday August 09, 2021 @05:57PM (#28122830)
Exactly. I don’t remember the exact cycle but basically you first get grass type colonisers, then you might get shrubs, then possibly trees densifying to a forest. Even the tree presence would change as the forest builds up as some essences don’t like being crowded (so won’t replace themselves once the forest densifies) while others prefer shade (so won’t appear until there’s a canopy proper).
Re:Wildfire restored a Yosemite watershed by rleigh on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @08:52AM (#28128188)
It is called "secondary succession" (primary being colonisation from scratch on bare rock)
Re:Wildfire restored a Yosemite watershed by throaway3141593 on Monday August 09, 2021 @04:04PM (#28121686)
Perhaps a new forest, but plants in general (current conditions may favor grassland, or something else). It's "re" because there was an ecosystem there before, and now it's returning. Contrast with, say, a brand new island that is the result of volcanic action. Then it'd be just plain old colonization by way of wind-blown seeds, or seeds that survived a bird's digestive tract.