They have perfectly sane reasons for wanting that - you just don't agree. And if you are unable to see that, then the fault lies with you, not with them.
You think they are doing things just to annoy you, or for no reason at all.
They are choosing things because they think it's the best thing to do.
But you seem incapable of realizing that someone may actually have a different opinion about something. You seem to think that if they have a different opinion it must mean that they are not rational.
Name one.
Both parties are guilty of deficit spending (republicans more so) and new representatives were elected in 2010 to reduce spending.
And whatever answer they give you, if you think that it's not a sane reason then the problem lies with you, not with them.
It's hard, but eventually you will learn to accept that other people have different opinions about things - even things that seem totally obvious to you.
Now you're asking me to go prove your assertions for you. I wasn't the one who made the claim.
It's hard, but eventually you will learn to accept that other people have different opinions about things - even things that seem totally obvious to you.
This is unnecessary. I do accept that other people have different opinions. What I don't accept is that they are inherently sane, which is the assertion you made. I simply asked you to support the claim that there are sane reasons with an example of such a reason.
The problem is, once your opponent in this game of chicken has visibly guzzled a fifth of bourbon and torn off his steering wheel, it's too late for you to do the same.