Re:Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
by em500 on Monday August 09, 2021 @07:03AM
(#28115154)
Of course, many problems have fairly obvious physical solutions you ignore all costs of said "solutions". Containing a pandemic is also not rocket science. Just have everybody stay at home simulataneously for 2 or 3 months.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
by Frost1x on Monday August 09, 2021 @07:16AM
(#28115271)
It's not even that simple:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-species_transmission
With pathogens that jump between species, as SARS-CoV-2 has with several populations, including white-tailed deer[1] in the US, you potentially need to isolate all reservoir species from each other as well.
Re:Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
by hnlmorg on Monday August 09, 2021 @07:26AM
(#28115350)
Cross species transmission is rare and while some cases have been reported, they're really the exception rather than the norm.
If there was really that big of a risk where we'd need mammals to isolate as well, then veterinarian services the world over would have collapsed under the weight of house pets contracting the virus.
edit: curious about the downvotes. Perhaps you have proof that has eluded the virologists researching SARS-CoV-2. Please do speak up ;)
Re:Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
by Vecr on Monday August 09, 2021 @03:54PM
(#28121586)
Why would they get severe disease when they get infected? Even most humans don't, let alone other species with different receptor setups. The virus is absolutely in non-human animal populations almost everywhere, and is not a candidate for eradication.
Re:Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
by tomp on Monday August 09, 2021 @10:36AM
(#28117417)
> Just have everybody stay at home simulataneously for 2 or 3 months.
You probably wrote this half-jokingly, but actually… this is exactly what Australia tried last year and … well it’s still trying.