News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Imaging Cygnus a at 8.45 GHz with ATA by ncmncm on Sunday August 08, 2021 @10:15PM (#28112075)
The inverse-square law always applies at distances like this. But the GP's remark probably refers to the difference in intensity between slight changes in angle. I.e., if you are ten times as far away, but just a hair closer to the beam center, you might have more flesh ripped from your bones anyway.
Re:Imaging Cygnus a at 8.45 GHz with ATA by ncmncm on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @12:36AM (#28125170)
Another way to say this is that inverse-square applies exactly on any exactly radial path. But, close to the beam, even an unnoticeably oblique path may yield radically different results. In real life, you rarely get exactness, so in such a circumstance you should be prepared to find intensity varying along a very different curve.