News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by andi999 on Saturday August 07, 2021 @08:43AM (#28098184)
My pick with Latex is: Error messages look to me as complicated as C++ template errors, packages sometimes don't work well together, a lot of boilerplate is usually needed, and I feel somehow the Syntax needs too many keystrokes, like why not make {} for sub and superscript optional and everything until the next space character is sub or superscripted (and not only one character). Also writing {\rm text} feels wrong. Shdnd it be \rm {text} and maybe instead one shd be able to use $ in an equation block to get to a non italic font.

While markdown is not advanced enough, I feel the making it easier for the user to use is the right modern approach, from which maybe a full system could be designed.

Also figure placement should allow more fine-tuning (not sure how, and yes this is against the original spirit)

Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by BeFlatXIII on Sunday August 08, 2021 @09:56AM (#28106722)
Might the {\rm text} notation be LISP-inspired syntax? Replace the braces with parentheses and remove the slash and you get `(rm text)`
Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by andi999 on Sunday August 08, 2021 @12:14PM (#28107766)
Somehow \mbox is the opposite though (see the examples) : https://www.tutorialspoint.com/tex_commands/mbox.htm

Honestly I think I am missing all the points about brackets in Latex, if somebody knows the Syntax (and the 'why' pls tell me).