Apple’s new abuse prevention system: an antritust/competition point of view

Re:Apple’s new abuse prevention system: an antritust/competi... by ostenning on Saturday August 07, 2021 @04:25AM (#28096894)

But for any serious charge you need indisputable evidence, and usually lots of it, usually the threshold is quite high.. But in the United States the system is insane so I could be wrong

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple’s new abuse prevention system: an antritust/competi... by himinlomax on Saturday August 07, 2021 @05:18AM (#28097129)

All the evidence required is that it is there.

Does not matter if someone else put it there without your knowledge. Or maybe it matters, but then it's on you (for all intents and purposes) to prove that it was without your knowledges.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple’s new abuse prevention system: an antritust/competi... by alisonkisk on Saturday August 07, 2021 @08:55AM (#28098244)

The punishment for strict liability is much lower than for the same act with intent.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple’s new abuse prevention system: an antritust/competi... by intricatedetail on Saturday August 07, 2021 @09:41AM (#28098514)

It's still essentially a death sentence if you are innocent.

[ Parent | on HN ]