Re:Homelessness is about housing
by nate_meurer on Friday August 06, 2021 @10:09PM
(#28095053)
Well, and I didn't exactly mean no homeless. A more relevant question might have been, "do you know of million+ cities in the western hemisphere without a large and growing homeless population?" Or something like that.
To me, the answer is more valuable as way to set expectations, rather than a binary verdict on whether the problem is solvable. Is it reasonable to shoot merely for a more manageable homeless population, rather than a complete fix that may not be attainable outside of Japan?
Manageable meant in contrast to out of control with no end in sight.
EDIT:
Will someone kindly upvote the parent comment? I've lost voting privileges.
> "do you know of million+ cities in the western hemisphere without a large and growing homeless population?"
Well that’s convenient, because all the examples I want to emulate are in the eastern hemisphere.
Re:Homelessness is about housing
by nate_meurer on Saturday August 07, 2021 @02:13PM
(#28100640)
That's fair, but I have doubts about whether we can emulate anything significant from such vastly different societies. Hope I'm wrong.
But I'm very unimpressed with the Bay Area Patriot argument that there are homeless in every big city, so SF is not special.
It reminds me of the eternal Onion headline "‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens".