U.S. FTC says Facebook misused privacy decree to shut down ad research

Re:U.S. FTC says Facebook misused privacy decree to shut dow... by kcplate on Friday August 06, 2021 @08:34PM (#28094462)

Plaintiff: “Judge, when the defendant used my public website, a contract with me was implicitly made”

Judge: “what defendant? There is no one here.”

Plaintiff: “Oh he was anonymous, so I am not sure who it was…”

Judge: “Hmm interesting, so you seem to think an implicit contract exists that you want to enforce with no documentation at all with a party you can’t name, because you are not sure who it is?”

Plaintiff: “Exactly.”

Judge: “Feel free to come back when you aren’t going to waste the court’s time”

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. FTC says Facebook misused privacy decree to shut dow... by throwwebmaster on Sunday August 08, 2021 @02:12PM (#28108752)

This clear instance of reductio ad absurdum is wholly non-analogous. Factually inaccurate court proceeding depictions and legal misunderstandings aside, for one thing, the non-hypothetical defendant’s identity is well-known in this specific instance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. FTC says Facebook misused privacy decree to shut dow... by kcplate on Sunday August 08, 2021 @03:48PM (#28109521)

Interesting. I would have thought that someone with the ability to craft such a sesquipedalian response would also have been capable of understanding irony.

Also…you missed the word “public”, again.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. FTC says Facebook misused privacy decree to shut dow... by throwwebmaster on Sunday August 08, 2021 @04:02PM (#28109639)

While I appreciate your nod to my writing (I have a mutual appreciation, I might add, for your Soliloquising), again, none of the data obtained was public.

[ Parent | on HN ]