Re:On Apple’s “Expanded Protections for Children” – A Person...
by supermatt on Friday August 06, 2021 @06:17AM
(#28085230)
Didn’t downvote, but didn’t understand context of your comment given who you replied to. Maybe that’s why downvotes?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:On Apple’s “Expanded Protections for Children” – A Person...
by nine_k on Friday August 06, 2021 @06:24AM
(#28085293)
I think the context is suitable: the arguments for increasing efforts of law enforcement, because "think of the children", accompanied with promises that only the good guys will have the new technical means, and the law enforcement won't even make honest mistakes using it, to say nothing of ever abusing it.